inequality-opoly.com : learn a racial inequities board game? The mission of Inequality-opoly is to spread awareness and advance discourse about the effects of Structural Racism and Sexism in America. The objective of Inequality-opoly is to battle with or benefit from Structural Racism and/or Sexism to become the wealthiest player and partnership by buying, renting, developing property, and (most importantly) making deals. Whichever player or partnership has the most wealth at the end of the game wins. See extra information on racial inequities board game.
Diversity And Inclusion tip of the day : To cope with the ever-increasing competitive edge, it is inevitable to retain diverse talents. That’s where the concept of inclusion comes in. It refers to the efforts that help an employee feel like an essential part of the mixed teams, irrespective of the differences. It focuses on creating an environment where diverse employees are accepted and appreciated. Without inclusion activities, diversity is meaningless. As an employer or manager, diversity and inclusion should be the top priorities in your talent management strategy.
Interestingly, Clemons pointed out that the original version of Monopoly was an imitation of The Landlord’s Game, an educational board game created at the end of the 19th century by Lizzie Magie for the purpose of showing that monopolies lead to a harmful accumulation of wealth that comes at the expense of others. A few decades later, Charles Darrow, who is typically credited for inventing the game, teamed up with a political cartoonist to create Monopoly – a skillfully redesigned version of Magie’s game, but whose wealth-accumulation objective is essentially the opposite of what Magie was trying to achieve – and sold it to Parker Brothers. (I will pause, if only parenthetically, to point out the irony of a man achieving fame and wealth by copying a woman’s idea and taking credit for it.)
One of the things that originally drove me to work in the Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) space was the stark contrast between the gut-wrenching emotions of hearing about specific experiences of individuals in a given demographic group, and the detached analysis of statistical, population-level data that describe the group as a whole. This is true for any type of societal context: in the workplace, talking about the high churn rate of women does not convey the kinds of individual stories we heard thanks to the #metoo movement; in a city, the statistics about disproportionate policing of Black people does not begin to convey the sensations we get when we watch videos of George Floyd’s murder.
Goldman Sachs held a four-month listening tour to learn about the challenges Black women face, directly from Black women. They invited Black women across the country to share their challenges and offer suggestions. Participants included community advocates, small business owners, corporate leaders, union workers, college and university faculty, and more. Through a partnership, the Urban Institute analyzed each session to find common themes that will inform Goldman Sachs’ future investments. We heard one thing over and over: systemic racism has created barriers for Black women to achieve economic well-being. To address this challenge, Goldman Sachs can focus on solutions that help Black women build and attain wealth and address income gaps. Read even more details at racial inequities board game.